LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post Reply
Bigfieroman
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:31 pm

LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by Bigfieroman »

Should I be comparing Lambda or Lambda Adj. to Lambda Commanded in my datalogs for an 07 S2000? All I have been able to find in the forums was Ktuner saying Lambda Adjusted is used for "older platforms".
KTuner
Site Admin
Posts: 3745
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by KTuner »

If you don't have a wideband at a dyno to compare to, stick with the non-adjusted.
Bigfieroman
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:31 pm

Re: LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by Bigfieroman »

I do not have anything to compare it to. I just replaced the stock O2 with a new Denso to hedge my bets against inaccuracy though. Thank you for the answer.
KTuner
Site Admin
Posts: 3745
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by KTuner »

No problem.
Bigfieroman
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:31 pm

Re: LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by Bigfieroman »

I have since added a stand-alone NTK AFM to the car, and I can say with certainty that anyone tuning with the stock sensor should be tuning to LAM.ADJ, not LAM. The standalone meter is dead on the adjusted value, so using unadjusted will end up being much leaner than intended.
KTuner
Site Admin
Posts: 3745
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: LAM or LAM.ADJ for 2007 S2000

Post by KTuner »

Thanks for the follow up. We had only seen the older Civics really need the Adj value.
Post Reply

Return to “06-09 S2000 Specific”