Base map slower than stock?
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:24 am
‘19 CR-V with ECU code 5PA-653 and just installed the base 18.5 dual map.
Before this I used a “Dragy” performance meter for a baseline test.
Stock I got 7.7 0-60 and 15.94 1/4 mile.
After flashing and using 91 octane I got 7.9 and 16.04 test results. I thought it felt better but a billion dollar satellite system doesn’t lie.
Temp difference between the two days was only 8*. Exact same road and direction with minimal wind both days.
Multiple runs, same results.
Thoughts???
Hate to think I paid $600+ bucks to go slower.
Thanks for any tips/suggestions.
Before this I used a “Dragy” performance meter for a baseline test.
Stock I got 7.7 0-60 and 15.94 1/4 mile.
After flashing and using 91 octane I got 7.9 and 16.04 test results. I thought it felt better but a billion dollar satellite system doesn’t lie.
Temp difference between the two days was only 8*. Exact same road and direction with minimal wind both days.
Multiple runs, same results.
Thoughts???
Hate to think I paid $600+ bucks to go slower.
Thanks for any tips/suggestions.