Page 1 of 1

Base map slower than stock?

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:24 am
by Davesxx01
‘19 CR-V with ECU code 5PA-653 and just installed the base 18.5 dual map.
Before this I used a “Dragy” performance meter for a baseline test.
Stock I got 7.7 0-60 and 15.94 1/4 mile.
After flashing and using 91 octane I got 7.9 and 16.04 test results. I thought it felt better but a billion dollar satellite system doesn’t lie.
Temp difference between the two days was only 8*. Exact same road and direction with minimal wind both days.
Multiple runs, same results.
Thoughts???
Hate to think I paid $600+ bucks to go slower.
Thanks for any tips/suggestions.

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 6:31 pm
by KTuner
Watch knock control to see how the system is performing with your fuel quality and environmental factors. There are other quick adjustments you can control as well to aid with how boost comes in.

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 12:11 am
by Davesxx01
Ok, did a Datalog and found that even with the 19.5 Dual map the boost targets are only 16 and when I’m at 100% throttle the ECU was only commanding 80%.
Can I get help with this issue?

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:13 am
by KTuner
Sounds like you haven't properly flashed a tune in or knock control is causing pull back, as we outlined knock control as something to watch. Results for the 19s have been verified.

We don't see an account with your registered email address so feel free to reach out to support directly via email from your registered KTuner software account address for anything further.