Base map slower than stock?

Locked
Davesxx01
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:13 am

Base map slower than stock?

Post by Davesxx01 »

‘19 CR-V with ECU code 5PA-653 and just installed the base 18.5 dual map.
Before this I used a “Dragy” performance meter for a baseline test.
Stock I got 7.7 0-60 and 15.94 1/4 mile.
After flashing and using 91 octane I got 7.9 and 16.04 test results. I thought it felt better but a billion dollar satellite system doesn’t lie.
Temp difference between the two days was only 8*. Exact same road and direction with minimal wind both days.
Multiple runs, same results.
Thoughts???
Hate to think I paid $600+ bucks to go slower.
Thanks for any tips/suggestions.
KTuner
Site Admin
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Post by KTuner »

Watch knock control to see how the system is performing with your fuel quality and environmental factors. There are other quick adjustments you can control as well to aid with how boost comes in.
Davesxx01
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:13 am

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Post by Davesxx01 »

Ok, did a Datalog and found that even with the 19.5 Dual map the boost targets are only 16 and when I’m at 100% throttle the ECU was only commanding 80%.
Can I get help with this issue?
KTuner
Site Admin
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: Base map slower than stock?

Post by KTuner »

Sounds like you haven't properly flashed a tune in or knock control is causing pull back, as we outlined knock control as something to watch. Results for the 19s have been verified.

We don't see an account with your registered email address so feel free to reach out to support directly via email from your registered KTuner software account address for anything further.
Locked

Return to “CR-V Platform”